Hw for 3/25

Some key differences between film and other mediums we have discussed in class (such as photography and graphic narratives) include providing different roles for the audience member, constant movement and “mise-en-scène”. Film, unlike photography and graphic narratives, asks that the audience sit back and view the artistic product. It does not require picking up a book and flipping pages for example. Movies are also in constant motion, sort of like a sped up graphic narrative which lacks “gutters” that provide short gaps in time. When watching a movie, time is manipulated by light, dialogue and camera play. Lastly, while both photography and graphic narratives reflect aspects of “miss-en-scène”, it is more typically thought of as a cinematographic characteristic. The placement of objects/subjects (set-pieces, characters in action, lighting, etc.) crafts a desired and anticipated image on the part of the movie director. Such desired images can be achieved in staged photography but because the frame lacks movement, photographic miss-en-scene is less affective at telling a story. Similarly, while the elements within the panels of graphic narratives are consciously chosen, because they are hand drawn they are not as successful. 

From the Corrigan and Kawin pieces I learned a lot about perspective and what to pay attention to upon viewing a film. I learned that things that appear in succession are significant and that the angle a certain shot is taken can manipulate how characters are physically and metaphysically represented. Lastly and most interestingly, i learned that movies can lack narratives. ‘Nonnarritives’ as they are called “do not tell stories” (Corrigan 41). This was the most fascinating because I originally thought films were all about story telling, now I see that the message and purpose of the movie might be more important. 

Advertisements

One thought on “Hw for 3/25

  1. katherinehauser

    Good points here – though I would temper your language a little bit – rather than say that film is more “successful” we can agree that it just does different things than other media. If one wanted to fully appreciate all the details about a scene, then photography is better for that, because one can linger on it – depends on what one is looking for!: 3.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s